THE THAT CHECK

14 01 2012

Back in 2009, I took an IIA auditing course in NYC. Of course we never discussed fiction at all, but at one point instructor Rebecca Goza went over her perspective on how auditors should prepare written reports to be reviewed by their senior management. After a commonsense appeal for brevity, she went on to provide a specific recommendation I’d never heard before: to use the Find function in the word processor, and eradicate the word “that” from the report, because the word “that” is never necessary!

Of course, writing fiction is different from writing a summary of audit findings. All the same, I’m impressed at how valuable this was. The word “that”, while extremely useful in spoken dialogue as a demonstrative pronoun, can also be an ugly crutch.

One night, doing a find-and-replace of the word “that”, I took off a total of 800 words! Not all of the eliminated words were the word “that”, of course; most came from the re-working of many passages this mass deletion had made necessary. The re-worked passages were generally shorter, occasionally longer, but always packed more punch.

One battle scene started with this: His mind couldn’t possibly hold enough magic to destroy them all, but that wasn’t necessary.

It ended like this: He couldn’t hold enough magic in his mind to destroy them all, but he didn’t need to.

Our understanding of the word “that” forces us to step outside the visceral, so we can compartmentalize our thoughts, arranging them in a sort of internal flowchart. Taking it out of this particular sentence definitely helped keep the character, and the reader, in the battle (right where they both should be). In the above example, “that” is a demonstrative pronoun representing a concept (the premise that the hero’s mind can hold enough magic to destroy all his enemies) — directly after that concept was already spelled out. Dull, dull, dull.

Of course, some “thats” made the cut: when the word “that” is used as a demonstrative pronoun, where it directly and unambiguously represents something visceral . . . it can stay.

He grabbed his rifle. “I think that’s a crocodile.”

 

Advertisements

Actions

Information

2 responses

28 05 2012
@SadieSForsythe

Ah, one more word to eradicate from my writing vocabulary. I hadn’t really considered ‘that’ before, but you’re right it has to go. Thanks for a great post.

29 05 2012
johnblackport

Thank You! Remember though, the word “that” can be a pronoun . . . but sometimes it’s an adjective. So while it’s often a very good word to delete, it must be deleted with care.

As an adjective, it can be incredibly useful in dialogue, like here:

Tranquilize that kangaroo before he initiates the self-destruct sequence!

In that case, the word “that” can be incredibly useful in dialogue, particularly when the speaker is sharing the bridge of her starship with 38 kangaroos, and is pointing out the single suicidal specimen.

But “that” can also be a pretty lame adjective. And yes, “pretty” can be a pretty lame adverb.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s




%d bloggers like this: